Journal of Space Science and Technology

Journal of Space Science and Technology

Comparison of G-Hot Plate and Three Point Methods to Measure Thermal Conductivity of Fibrous Insulation

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors
1 PhD., Department of Engineering Aerospace, Shahid Sattari Aeronautical University, Tehran, Iran
2 Phd., Department of Engineering Aerospace, Shahid Sattari Aeronautical University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Laboratory methods for steady-state and transient testing are two well-known approaches for measuring the heat transfer coefficient. Transient methods are more widely used due to their lower cost and broader temperature range. However, their application in fibrous insulation is more limited due to the low thermal conductivity and non-homogeneous nature of these materials. Guarded hot plate and three-point methods are two significant transient techniques for measuring the heat transfer coefficient in fibrous insulations. This paper compares these two testing methods, with the primary evaluation criterion being the minimum variance in the final experimental results. The variance of the final results is inversely proportional to the determinant of the sensitivity matrix. To compute the sensitivity matrix, the transient temperature distribution across the insulation thickness is first calculated using an initial estimate of the heat transfer coefficient, obtained from other experimental sources. Changes in the number and placement of thermal sensors, the insulation geometry, and the test duration affect the determinant of the sensitivity matrix. The optimal experiment is determined by identifying the maximum determinant of this matrix. Studies show that in the three-point method, the optimal setup consists of two thermal sensors placed on an insulation layer with a thickness of 2 cm, over a duration of 100 seconds. In contrast, in the guarded hot plate method, the optimal setup includes two thermal sensors on insulation with a height of 5 cm, over a 300-second testing period. The analysis indicates that the variance of the final results in the three-point method is lower than in the guarded hot plate method, which can significantly enhance the accuracy of heat transfer coefficient measurements.
Keywords
Subjects

Article Title Persian

مقایسه روش‌های آزمایش صفحه داغ حفاظ‌دار و سه نقطه برای اندازه‌گیری ضریب انتقال حرارتی در عایق‌های فیبری

Authors Persian

امین ترابی 1
سید محمد نیکویی 2
1 دکتری مهندسی هوافضا، دانشکده مهندسی هوافضا، دانشگاه شهید ستاری، تهران، ایران
2 دکتری مهندسی هوافضا، دانشکده مهندسی هوافضا، دانشگاه شهید ستاری، تهران، ایران
Abstract Persian

روش‌های آزمایشگاهی پایا و گذرا دو روش شناخته‌شده برای اندازه‌گیری ضریب انتقال حرارت هستند. روش‌های گذرا به دلیل هزینه پایین و طیف دمایی گسترده‌تر کاربرد بیشتری دارند. ولی در مورد عایق‌های فیبری کاربرد روش‌های گذرا کمتر است. این موضوع به دلیل رسانایی ضعیف، نمونه‌های غیرهمگن در این عایق‌ها است. صفحه داغ حفاظ‌دار و سه نقطه، دو روش مهم در اندازه‌گیری ضریب انتقال حرارت در عایق‌های فیبری محسوب می‌شوند. این مقاله به مقایسه این دو روش آزمایش پرداخته و معیار اصلی بررسی، حداقل واریانس در نتیجه نهایی آزمایش است. واریانس نتیجه نهایی نسبت معکوس با دترمینان ماتریس حساسیت دارد. برای محاسبه ماتریس حساسیت، ابتدا توزیع دما در ضخامت عایق حرارتی به‌صورت گذرا و با در نظر گرفتن تخمین اولیه برای ضرایب انتقال حرارت محاسبه می‌شود. این تخمین اولیه از داده‌های آزمایشگاهی منابع دیگر به‌دست آمده است. تغییر در تعداد سنسورهای حرارتی، محل قرارگیری آنها، هندسه عایق و مدت زمان آزمایش باعث تغییر در مقدار دترمینان ماتریس حساسیت خواهد شد. آزمایش بهینه با یافتن مقدار بیشینه این دترمینان مشخص می‌شود. بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهند که در روش آزمایش گذرای سه نقطه، حالت بهینه استفاده از دو سنسور حرارتی بر روی عایق با ضخامت ۲ سانتی‌متر طی ۱۰۰ ثانیه است، در حالی که در روش صفحه داغ حفاظ‌دار، حالت بهینه شامل دو سنسور حرارتی روی عایق با ارتفاع ۵ سانتی‌متر طی ۳۰۰ ثانیه می‌باشد. تحلیل‌ها نشان می‌دهند که واریانس نتیجه نهایی در روش سه نقطه، کمتر از روش صفحه داغ حفاظ‌دار است، که می‌تواند تأثیر مهمی بر دقت اندازه‌گیری ضریب انتقال حرارت داشته باشد.

Keywords Persian

طراحی آزمایش
عایق حرارتی دما بالا
آزمایش گذرا
روش سه نقطه
روش صفحه داغ حفاظ‌دار
[1] S. C. Lee and G. R. Cunnington, "Conduction and radiation heat transfer in high-porosity fiber thermal insulation," Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121–136, 2000, https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6508.
[2] R. Arambakam, H. Vahedi Tafreshi, and B. Pourdeyhimi, "A simple simulation method for designing fibrous insulation materials," Materials & Design, vol. 44, pp. 99–106, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.058.
[3] A. Torabi, A. Abedian, M. A. Farsi, and R. Kalantarinezhad, "Axiomatic design of a reflective multilayer high-temperature insulator," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 457–471, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017737576.
[4] A. Torabi, A. Abedian, and M. A. Farsi, "An approximate methodology to simulate combined conduction-radiation heat transfer for multi-layer insulator," Scientia Iranica, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2924-2932, 2020, 10.24200/sci.2019.53008.3003.
[5] N. Yüksel, "The Review of Some Commonly Used Methods and Techniques to Measure the Thermal Conductivity," in Insulation Materials in Context of Sustainability, A. Almusaed and A. Almssad, Eds. Croatia: IntechOpen, 2016, pp. 113-138.
[6] H. Liu, J. Liu, Y. Tian, X. Wu, and Z. Li, "Investigation of high temperature thermal insulation performance of fiber-reinforced silica aerogel composites," International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 183, 2023, Art. no. 107827, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107827.
[7] Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate Apparatus, C177-19E01, ASTM, 2019.
[8] Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus, C0518-21, ASTM, 2020.
[9] D. Fustinoni, L Vitali, P Gramazio, and A. Niro, "Accurate contact resistance characterization for thermal conductivity measurement with the heat flow meter method," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1868, 2021, Paper 012005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1868/1/012005.
[10] R. E. Taylor, J. Gembarovic, and K. D. Maglic, "Thermal diffusivity by the laser flash technique," in Characterization of Materials, E. N. Kaufman, Ed. vol. 1, United States: John Wiley & Sons, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471266965.com102.
[11] G. C. Glatzmaier and W. Fred Ramirez, "Simultaneous measurement of the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of unconsolidated materials by the transient hot wire method," Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1394–1398, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1138491.
[12] M. J. Assael, K. D. Antoniadis, D. Velliadou, and W. A. Wakeham, "Correct use of the transient hot-wire technique for thermal conductivity measurements on fluids," International Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 44, 2023, Art. no. 85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03195-1.
[13] N. P. Ramos, M. de Melo Antunes, G. Guimarães, and S. M. M. de Lima e Silva, "Simultaneous Bayesian estimation of the temperature-dependent thermal properties of a metal slab using a three-dimensional transient experimental approach." International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 179, 2022, Art. no. 107671, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107671.
[14] L. M. Heisig, R. Wulf, and T. M. Fieback, "Investigation and optimization of the hot disk method for thermal conductivity measurements up to 750°C," International Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 44, 2023, Art. no. 82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03190-6.
[15] B. M. Mihiretie et al., "Finite element modeling of the hot disc method," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 115, Part B, pp. 216-223, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.08.036.
[16] Y. Sekimoto, R. Abe. H. Kojima, H. Benten, and M. Nakamura, "Error factors in precise thermal conductivity measurement using 3 ω method for wire samples," Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 148, pp. 2285-2296, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11892-6.
[17] U. Hammerschmidt, J. Hameury, R. Strnad, E. Turzó-Andras, and J. Wu, "Critical review of industrial techniques for thermal-conductivity measurements of thermal insulation materials," International Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1530–1544, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-015-1863-x.
[18] J. Gembarovic and R. E. Taylor, "A method for thermal diffusivity determination of thermal insulators," International Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2164–2175, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-007-0279-7.
[19] M. Tychanicz-Kwiecień, J. Wilk, and P. Gil, "Review of high-temperature thermal insulation materials," Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 271–284, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.T5420.
[20] K. Daryabeigi, "Heat transfer in high-temperature fibrous insulation," Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2003, https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6746.
[21] Kamran Daryabeigi, "Thermal analysis and design of multi-layer insulation for re-entry aerodynamic heating," in 35th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2001, Paper 2834 https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-2834.
[22] B. M. Zhang, W. H. Xie, S. yi. Du, and S. Y. Zhao, "An experimental study of effective thermal conductivity of high temperature insulations," Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 130, no. 3, 2008, Art. no. 034504, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2804946.
[23] S. Y. Zhao, B. M. Zhang, and S. Y. Du, "An inverse analysis to determine conductive and radiative properties of a fibrous medium," Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer, vol. 110, no. 13, pp. 1111–1123, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.03.022.
[24] S. Y. Zhao, B. M. Zhang, and X. D. He, "Temperature and pressure dependent effective thermal conductivity of fibrous insulation," International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 440–448, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.05.003.
[25] M. N Ozisik and H. R. B. OrlandeA, "Inverse heat transfer: Fundamentals and applications: Book review," Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. B18–B19, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1445337.
[26] H. R. B. Orlande, Inverse Heat Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003155157.
[27] P. C. Sabatier, Applied Inverse Problems: Lectures presented at the RCP 264 "Etude Interdisciplinaire des Problemes Inverses, 1st. Hamburg, Germany: Springer, 1978.
[28] J. V. Beck and K. J. Arnold, Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
[29] O. M. Alifanov, Inverse Heat Transfer Problems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994.
[30] K. A. Woodbury, Inverse Engineering Handbook, 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041613.
[31] H. R. B. Orlande, O. Fudym, D. Maillet, and R. M. Cotta, Thermal Measurements and Inverse Techniques, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2011.
[32] H. R. Alimohammadi, H. Naseh, and F. Ommi, "A new synthetic metamodel methodology for liquid‐propellant engine’s cooling system optimization," Heat Transfer, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 907–941, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.21911.
[33] R. Taktak, "Design and validation of optimal experiments for estimating thermal properties of composite materials," Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, USA, 1992.
[34] P. G. Klemens and R. K. Williams, "Thermal conductivity of metals and alloys," International Metals Reviews, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 197–215, 1986, https://doi.org/10.1179/imtr.1986.31.1.197.
 
Volume 18, Issue 2
2025
Pages 10-23

  • Receive Date 17 November 2024
  • Revise Date 16 May 2025
  • Accept Date 25 May 2025
  • First Publish Date 22 June 2025