علوم و فناوری فضایی

علوم و فناوری فضایی

A correction on the Lambert targeting problem in the perturbed space environment

نوع مقاله : مقالة‌ پژوهشی‌

نویسندگان
1 دانشکده علوم و فنون نوین، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشکده مهندسی هوافضا، دانشکده علوم و فناوری های میان رشته ای، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشکده فناوری های نوین، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران ، ایران
چکیده
This article introduces a novel correction algorithm designed to enhance the Lambert Targeting Problem (LTP) by addressing space perturbations. The proposed LTP Correction (LTPC) algorithm integrates the traditional LTP with the shooting method and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to improve targeting accuracy. Following an initial solution using the LTP, the LTPC employs five sequential and iterative refinement stages to converge on a more precise result. The LTPC modifies the classical LTP to incorporate space perturbations, with Earth's oblateness being the primary perturbation considered. However, the algorithm is versatile and can be adapted to account for various types of space perturbations, broadening its applicability. The results demonstrate that the delta true anomaly, the difference between the desired arrival true anomaly and the actual arrival true anomaly, achieved by the LTPC is significantly smaller than that of the traditional LTP. This improvement highlights the LTPC's superior targeting accuracy. Notably, the LTPC achieves this enhanced precision without requiring a substantial increase in flight time or total velocity change compared to the classical LTP. This balance of accuracy and efficiency underscores the LTPC's effectiveness as a robust solution for space missions influenced by perturbations, paving the way for more reliable mission planning and execution.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

[1]   J. J. Gray, "Johann heinrich lambert, mathematician and scientist, 1728–1777," Historia Mathematica, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–41, 1978, https://doi.org/10.1016/0315-0860(78)90133-7.
[2]   J. Kriz, "A uniform solution of the lambert problem," Celestial Mechanics, vol. 14, pp. 509–513, 1976, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01229061.
[3]   A. Sukhanov and A. F. B. A. Prado, "Lambert problem solution in the hill model of motion," Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 90, pp. 331–354, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-1508-z.
[4]   H. Leeghim and B. A. Jaroux, "Energy-optimal solution to the lambert problem," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1008–1010, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46606.
[5]   R. M. Woollands, A. Bani Younes, and J. L. Junkins, "New solutions for the perturbed lambert problem using regularization and picard iteration," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1548–1562, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001028.
[6]   B. F. Thompson and L. J. Rostowfske, "Practical constraints for the applied Lambert problem," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 967–974, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004765.
[7]   P. V. Arlulkar and S. D. Naik, "Solution based on dynamical approach for multiple-revolution lambert problem," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 920–923, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51723.
[8]   Q. He, J. Li, and C. Han, "Multiple-revolution solutions of the transverse-eccentricity-based lambert problem," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 265–269, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.45041.
[9]   N. Adurthi and M. Majji, "Uncertain lambert problem: A probabilistic approach," The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 67, pp. 361–386, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-019-00205-z.
[10] Q. M. Al-Mdallal, M. I. Syam, and M. N. Anwar, "A collocation-shooting method for solving fractional boundary value problems," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3814–3822, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.01.020.
[11] S. N. Ha, "A nonlinear shooting method for two-point boundary value problems," Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 42, no. 10–11, pp. 1411–1420, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00250-4.
[12] H. Hajimirsadeghi and C. Lucas, "A hybrid IWO/PSO algorithm for fast and global optimization," in IEEE EUROCON 2009, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2009, pp. 1964–1971, https://doi.org/10.1109/EURCON.2009.5167916.
[13] M. Bakhtiari, K. Daneshjou, and E. Abbasali, "A new approach to derive a formation flying model in the presence of a perturbing body in inclined elliptical orbit: relative hovering analysis," Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 362, 2017, Art. no. 36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2968-9.
[14] E. Abbasali, A. Kosari, and M. Bakhtiari, "Effects of oblateness of the primaries on natural periodic orbit-attitude behaviour of satellites in three body problem," Advances in Space Research, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 4379-4397, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.08.026.
[15] M. Bakhtiari, E. Abbasali, S. Sabzy, and A. Kosari, "Natural coupled orbit—attitude periodic motions in the perturbed-CRTBP including radiated primary and oblate secondary," Astrodynamics, vol. 7, pp. 229–249, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-022-0154-0.
[16] E. Abbasali, A. Kosari, and M. Bakhteiari, "Restricted three-body problem considering perturbations of oblate primaries," Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 27-35, 2020, https://doi.org/10.22034/jast.2021.128013.
[17] A. Shirazi, J. Ceberio, and J. A. Lozano, "Optimal multi-impulse space rendezvous considering limited impulse using a discretized Lambert problem combined with evolutionary algorithms," in 8th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (Eucass), Madrid, Spain, 2019, pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.13009/EUCASS2019-215.
[18] A. Shirazi, J. Ceberio, and J. A. Lozano, "An evolutionary discretized Lambert approach for optimal long-range rendezvous considering impulse limit," Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 94, 2019, Art. no. 105400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105400.
[19] D. A. Vallado, Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, 2nd ed. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.
[20] H. D. Curtis, Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students, 3rd ed. Elsevier Science, 2013.
[21] M. Bakhtiari, K. Daneshjou, and M. Fakoor, "Relative hovering analysis about an elliptical perturbed orbit with consideration of dynamic air drag and oblate Earth," Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 70, pp. 286–299, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.07.034.
[22] M. Bakhtiari, K. Daneshjou, and A. A. Mohammadi-Dehabadi, "The effects of parking orbit elements on designing of on-orbit servicing missions," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 233, no. 3, pp. 793–810, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017740921.
[23] E. Abbasali, A. Kosari, M. Bakhtiari, "Achieving solar sail orbital maintenance with adjustable ballast masses in the ERTBP," Advances in Space Research, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1297-1309, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.064.
[24] E. Abbasali, A. Kosari, and M. Bakhtiari, "Solar sail orbital motion at the non-autonomous oblate Earth-Moon System: Family of periodic orbits," Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 94, pp. 3785-3801, 2024,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-024-02695-2.
[25] M. Bakhtiari and E. Abbasali, "An optimal deployment strategy for multi-plane satellite constellation using a generalized non-planar maneuver," Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 369, 2024, Art. no. 26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-024-04288-5.
[26] M. Bakhtiari, E. Abbasali, and K. Daneshjoo, "Minimum cost perturbed multi-impulsive maneuver methodology to accomplish an optimal deployment scheduling for a satellite constellation," The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 70, 2023, Art. no. 18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-023-00381-z.

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 07 دی 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 09 دی 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 09 دی 1403